Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
- Justice Kagan
- You said that as the law is now, under your interpretation of it, Texas is allowed to set much, much higher medical standards, whether it has to do with the personnel or procedures or the facilities themselves, higher medical standards, including much higher medical standards for abortion facilities than for facilities that do any other kind of medical work, even much more risky medical work.
- Mr. Keller
- Correct, in this Court’s in Simopoulos.
- Justice Kagan
- And I guess I just want to know why would Texas do that?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/15-274_l53m.pdf
Kingdomware Tech., Inc. v. United States
- Chief Justice Roberts
- I’m sorry. When you say you’re crushing the goals, that means you’re meeting them?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/14-916_c18e.pdf
Markazi v. Peterson
- Justice Scalia
- I wrote it. I just don’t remember.
(Laughter.)
- Justice Scalia
- Do you know how many cases I’ve written?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/14-770_m64o.pdf
Obergefell v. Hodges
- Justice Scalia
- I join The Chief Justice’s opinion in full. I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
Obergefell v. Hodges
- Justice Scalia
- But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
United States v. Wong
- Justice Scalia
- You think man means women, right? Never mind.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/13-1074_m64n.pdf
Comptroller of the Treasury of MD v. Wynne
- Justice Scalia
- Right, you’re on the principle that life is not fair, right?
- Mr. Brockman
- Life is not fair. Maryland taxes are.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/13-485_3f14.pdf
Holt v. Hobbs
- Justice Scalia
- Well, religious beliefs aren’t reasonable. I mean, religious beliefs are categorical. You know, it’s God tells you. It’s not a matter of being reasonable. God be reasonable? He’s supposed to have a full beard.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/13-6827_8758.pdf
United States v. Wurie
- Ms. Mizner
- Well, this Court has espoused a warrant presumption...
- Justice Scalia
- Well, but that — that presumption is — is simply not — you don’t believe that presumption, do you?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/13-212_g2il.pdf
Am. Trucking Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
- Mr. Rosenthal
- But we’re not—we’re not dealing with that hypothetical.
- Justice Scalia
- I know we’re not. That’s why it’s a hypothetical.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/11-798.pdf